Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Digital tax


A report by Bloomberg published in this paper recently indicated that Southeast Asia’s “internet economy” is forecast to double in gross merchandise value to $363 billion by 2025. Citing research from Google, Temasek Holdings Pte, and Bain & Co., Bloomberg noted that e-commerce, travel, media, transport, and food were driving the region’s digital growth.

Online spending was reported to have risen 49% year on year in 2021 to $174 billion, as Southeast Asia was said to have added 60 million new internet users since the start of the pandemic in early 2020. New users came mostly from Thailand and the Philippines. Online shopping alone is seen to account for 64% of digital gross merchandise value by 2025.

“Continued shifts in consumer and merchant behavior, matched with strong investor confidence, have ushered Southeast Asia to its ‘digital decade’ — and the region is on its way towards $1-trillion GMV (gross merchandise value) by 2030,” Google and its partners said in the report. Indonesia is the region’s largest digital economy, where online spending is seen to double to $146 billion by 2025.

Of course, as the regional economy shifts to digital, tax men will not be far behind. And rightly so. Government policies and regulations should also adjust to the changing times, so governments can sustain revenue collection. Such a shift, however, should not rushed. Research and study should pave the way for a thorough understanding not only of how the digital economy works but also how it is seen to evolve.

According to the Department of Finance, government agencies led by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) were now working together to evaluate how digital business models should be regulated and taxed in the Philippines, in an effort to “broaden the tax base.”

In a statement, Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III said he wanted the BIR and SEC to have “enough regulatory and collection muscle” to tax digital companies. To his mind, “operating in the digital space is just a platform. The type of activity doesn’t matter. It’s still taxable by the BIR and subject to the appropriate regulations of the SEC.”

The BIR will evaluate “digital” companies’ tax obligations based on categories identified by SEC and the Bangko Sentral. The National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), meantime, will update Philippine Standard Industry Classifications (PSIC) to possibly include “fintech” activities or entities as a type of financial service provider. The SEC also plans to come up with “fintech-specific” requirements for licensing and data security.

And then in Congress, there is the proposal to impose a 12% value-added tax or VAT on digital services. The intent is to tax sales by digital service providers of goods that are digital or electronic in nature, and services electronically rendered locally. The tax will cover resident as well as non-resident service providers, or those with subsidiaries, branches, or local office operating within Philippine territory.

As I mentioned in a previous column, considering the growing digital economy, I am inclined to support a Digital Services Tax as long as it hits mainly consumers from a higher income bracket. Moreover, as experts from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) noted, “new global reforms will change where tech giants pay taxes in Asia, and make the international tax system more robust.”

“More than half of all services trade in Asia is digitally delivered, making it hard to collect value-added taxes when these services cross borders. Cross-border e-commerce sales of goods have also been exempted from value-added taxes when shipped internationally in small parcels.

“Resolving these challenges pays off,” noted Era Dabla-Norris, division chief in the IMF’s Asia Pacific Department and mission chief for Vietnam; Ruud De Mooij, advisor in the IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Department; Andrew Hodge, economist in the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department; and, Dinar Prihardini, an economist in the IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Department.

In a blog, the IMF experts noted that “requiring nonresident suppliers of digital services and e-commerce marketplaces to register with local tax authorities and remit value-added taxes on their sales could raise revenue between 0.04 and 0.11 percent of GDP in some countries in Asia, translating to an additional $166 million in Bangladesh, $4.8 billion in India, $1.1 billion in Indonesia, $365 million in the Philippines, and $264 million in Vietnam.

“As Asian consumers and businesses increase their online activity in the coming years, tech giants will expand further into Asian countries, making taxation in a digitalizing economy even more important. Countries in Asia, in particular, can invest in ways to harness digitalization for tax administration, helping to reduce tax evasion, boost revenue mobilization, and make tax collection more efficient,” they added.

In this line, I believe that the Finance department is taking steps in the right direction. Not only the Philippines but the rest of the world will also be looking into how to best tax the digital sale of goods and digital services. However, regulators should try to learn from each other’s efforts, and adopt global best practices in this regard.

I also believe local regulators should take careful and calculated steps, rather than rushed ones, backed by a thorough examination of the digital economy’s tax potential. The government should also adopt a multisectoral approach and give time and resources for wider consultation with the industry and technical experts, in determining the proper and most practical approaches to digital taxation. It should let data and analysis lead the way.

Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippine Press Council

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!



The National Government’s outstanding debt reached a record P13.75 trillion as of end-February. — REUTERS/THOMAS WHITE/ILLUSTRATION By Keisha B. Ta-asan, Reporter THE NATIONAL Government’s...


Laborers work at a construction site in Manila, Philippines, Nov. 17, 2016. — REUTERS/CZAR DANCEL STATE SPENDING on infrastructure rose by 13.4% in 2022,...


A view of Metro Manila. — PHILIPPINE STAR/WALTER BOLLOZOS BUSINESSES NOW have a more optimistic economic outlook this year, amid a return to pre-pandemic...


SEVERAL former government officials are opposing the plan to merge Landbank of the Philippines (LANDBANK) with the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP), saying...


MONDE NISSIN CORP. suffered a net loss of P13.03 billion in 2022, a reversal of its P3.12-billion net income a year earlier, due to...


THE 68-MW “Garcia 2” Solar Project, located in the municipality of Currimao in Ilocos Norte. — VENAENERGY.COM MGEN RENEWABLE Energy, Inc. (MGreen) is keen...

You May Also Like


COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the mental health of Filipinos across different groups all over the archipelago. From frontline workers, parents balancing...


REUTERS By Luz Wendy T. Noble, Reporter The country’s foreign exchange buffers slightly increased as of end-October as the value of the central bank’s...


BW FILE PHOTO GROSS BORROWINGS by the National Government reached P2.6 trillion as of end-September as it continued to raise funds to respond to...


KARASOLAR.COM TENA, Ecuador — Ecuador’s rainforest Achuar people say their ancestors long dreamed of a “fire canoe” or “electric fish” that would let them...

Disclaimer: Respect, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2022 Respect Investment. All Rights Reserved.