Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Court affirms denial of Vestas’ tax refund claim for P92 million


THE Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) affirmed its ruling that denied Vestas Services Philippines, Inc.’s tax refund claim worth P92.04 million allegedly representing its excess value-added tax (VAT) traced to zero-rated sales for the fourth quarter of 2014.

In a 27-page decision dated Feb. 7 and made public on Feb. 14, the CTA full court said the firm filed its claim at the wrong revenue district office (RDO).

“With the foregoing, it becomes unequivocal that petitioner (Vestas) was indeed informed and/or notified of the completion of the transfer of its registration to RDO No. 51 prior to filing its application for value-added tax refund claim,” Associate Justice Jean Marie A. Bacorro-Villena said in the ruling. “However it deliberately filed its application for VAT refund in the wrong venue.”

The tax court said the claim must be voided since the venue the firm filed its refund claim did not have jurisdiction over it.

It also agreed with the CTA Third Division’s ruling that said the firm failed to prove that its sales were subject to a 0% VAT rating.

Under the country’s tax code, zero-rated sales are transactions made by VAT-registered taxpayers that do not result in any output tax.

Taxpayers must also file administrative claims in writing with the commissioner of internal revenue within two years after payment.

Vestas filed its refund claim at the old revenue office on Dec. 29, 2016, even after being informed of its Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) registration being transferred to RDO 51, which is based in Pasay City.

The petitioner had transferred its main office from Makati City to Pasay City, which led to the transfer of its BIR registration.

Vestas engages in the business of installation and construction services, including servicing wind power systems.

The CTA noted that the firm’s own witness admitted in open court that the firm was aware of the transfer of registration when the refund claim was filed.

“As petitioner did not deny the admissions nor claim that these were made through palpable mistake, the admitted facts are incontrovertible,” the tribunal said. — John Victor D. Ordoñez

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!



PHILIPPINE STAR/KRIZ JOHN ROSALES THE BANGKO SENTRAL ng Pilipinas (BSP) may consider a smaller 25-basis-point (bp) rate hike or even pause monetary policy tightening...


Telecommunications is considered a critical infrastructure under the implementing rules of Republic Act No. 11647, which amends the 85-year-old Public Service Act. — PHILIPPINE...


REUTERS THE PHILIPPINE banking sector is ready to withstand possible shocks arising from the recent failure of two midsized banks in the United States,...


PHILIPPINE STAR/EDD GUMBAN THE ECONOMY likely expanded by 7.1% in the first quarter, as consumption may have gotten a boost from higher remittances and...


MANILA Electric Co. (Meralco) is finalizing supply agreements to partially replace the 670 megawatts (MW) of lost capacity under a terminated contract with SMC...


A UNIT of Ayala-led ACEN Corp. opened its solar project’s first 521-megawatt direct current (MWdc) in Australia, which required the installation of about a...

You May Also Like


COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the mental health of Filipinos across different groups all over the archipelago. From frontline workers, parents balancing...


REUTERS By Luz Wendy T. Noble, Reporter The country’s foreign exchange buffers slightly increased as of end-October as the value of the central bank’s...


BW FILE PHOTO GROSS BORROWINGS by the National Government reached P2.6 trillion as of end-September as it continued to raise funds to respond to...


KARASOLAR.COM TENA, Ecuador — Ecuador’s rainforest Achuar people say their ancestors long dreamed of a “fire canoe” or “electric fish” that would let them...

Disclaimer: Respect, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2022 Respect Investment. All Rights Reserved.