Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editor’s Pick

We’ll pay for northern rail lines, say northern leaders

Northern leaders will seek to pay part of the cost of Northern Powerhouse Rail, such is their dismay over “deeply flawed” revisions to the project announced by Westminster last week.

Mayors, council leaders and transport bosses from northern regions expressed anger at the Integrated Rail Plan, which included plans to shelve a new high-speed line from Manchester to Leeds via Bradford, and a stretch from Liverpool to Warrington. The eastern leg of HS2, from the West Midlands to Leeds, was also axed.

Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, said that the rail plan was “deeply flawed”. At a Transport for the North meeting in Leeds, Burnham said that contributions towards the cost of improvements, including completing the Northern Powerhouse Rail network, could be gleaned from rising land values.

“To change the nature of the conversation I would be prepared to consider local contributions or ways of unlocking [them] to improve what has been proposed,” he said. “The motion asks for that process of mediation to see if there are other solutions, particularly around financing, that allows that new line via Bradford back on the table. I don’t believe we can possibly admit defeat on that issue. To do so would be failing generations in the north of England. We would be accepting a smaller economy for the north for the rest of our lives.”

The Integrated Rail Plan was announced by Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, last week, and set out plans for a GBP17.2 billion investment in Northern Powerhouse Rail. The commitment fell far short of the GBP42.1 billion that would have been needed for the plans, put forward by Transport for the North, in full.

Under the new plans some new high-speed track will be built, including between Manchester and Huddersfield. A line from Warrington to Manchester will also be built. The transpennine route from York to Manchester will be electrified by 2030-32.

Burnham highlighted that the building of Crossrail in the south included local contributions. In London property developers must pay into the mayor’s community infrastructure levy to help to fund the project on the basis that such properties would increase in value.

Burnham said: “When you commit to a line, you raise [the] value of some of the land across that line. If you take Bradford, land values would increase in the city centre, and other countries around the world give powers at a local level to capture that value to help pay for the infrastructure.”

The plans were backed by Don Mackenzie, a Conservative North Yorkshire councillor, who earlier criticised Labour politicians for making “well-rehearsed ever more negative statements” about the Integrated Rail Plan.

Hans Mundry, a councillor in Warrington, branded the plans a “mess” and said that construction of high-speed rail should have begun in the north. “None of this delivers what we were promised, it delivers bits and pieces. You’ve had the meal in the south and we can have what’s left on the table.”

Dan Jarvis, the mayor of South Yorkshire, said: “We still want to make the case for the government to do what they originally committed to do.”

Yesterday Dame Diana Johnson, the Labour MP for Kingston upon Hull North, said in the Commons that regeneration of cities such as Hull and Bradford “will be held back for another 20 years, with poor connectivity, small speed and inadequate capacity for passengers and freight”.

Transport for the North was stripped of its funding by ministers last week. Labour described the move as a “Whitehall power grab” after its furious reaction to plans to downgrade Northern Powerhouse Rail.

Johnson said: “By removing Transport for the North’s responsibility for developing [Northern Powerhouse Rail], ministers reduce scrutiny and accountability and show no interest in working in partnership with the north. So when challenged, ministers have decided to stop the criticism by gutting the powers of Transport for the North and centralising to Whitehall responsibility for rebranding the transpennine route upgrade.”

Andrew Stephenson, the rail minister, said: “Transport for the North is not a delivery body nor has it ever been. Their statutory function purely is to develop a strategic transport plan for the north in the same way that Midlands Connect does for the Midlands.”

Read more:
We’ll pay for northern rail lines, say northern leaders

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!


Editor’s Pick

The UK Government’s Flexible Working Taskforce has published practical guidance for employers designed to support hybrid working models, in a bid to help organisations...

Editor’s Pick

Becoming a franchisee gives people the chance to own a business in which they are invested and passionate – a stark contrast to working...

Editor’s Pick

Whilst we hear a lot about starting a business, it is not every day that we hear about leaving one. There are many reasons...

Editor’s Pick

There is no doubt that virtually every industry has experienced significant changes and shifts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst the economy is steadily recovering...

Editor’s Pick

A prominent Tory peer has been accused of racism for allegedly saying that someone was “a waste of a man’s white skin”. Baroness Mone,...

Editor’s Pick

Abrdn has struck a GBP1.5bn deal to buy the online investment platform Interactive Investor, as the fund manager pushes into the increasingly popular realm...

You May Also Like


COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the mental health of Filipinos across different groups all over the archipelago. From frontline workers, parents balancing...


BW FILE PHOTO GROSS BORROWINGS by the National Government reached P2.6 trillion as of end-September as it continued to raise funds to respond to...


REUTERS By Luz Wendy T. Noble, Reporter The country’s foreign exchange buffers slightly increased as of end-October as the value of the central bank’s...

Editor’s Pick

London has beaten off competition from Paris and Berlin to become the highest ranked European city for property investment, according to a survey...

Disclaimer: Respect, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2021 Respect Investment. All Rights Reserved.